<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Blogs</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.tayloremmet.co.uk/blogs</provider_url><title>How protected are protected conversations? | Blogs</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Kf2yu357qT"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.tayloremmet.co.uk/blogs/protected-protected-conversations/"&gt;How protected are protected conversations?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.tayloremmet.co.uk/blogs/protected-protected-conversations/embed/#?secret=Kf2yu357qT" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;How protected are protected conversations?&#x201D; &#x2014; Blogs" data-secret="Kf2yu357qT" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.tayloremmet.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.tayloremmet.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/TE.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>400</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>400</thumbnail_height><description>We now have an interesting case on how the Tribunals should approach &#x201C;protected conversations&#x201D; under section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and how this might differ from the traditional approach to without prejudice discussions. Since 29 July 2013 s.111A has rendered evidence of pre-termination negotiations inadmissible in unfair [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
